CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE NOW!!!

ALBHUSTAN HOTELS KATSINA

GAFAI COMMNICATIONS KATSINA Call 08035947436

A Message By: Katsina State Primary Healthcare Development Agency

MAIDABINO INVESTMENT LTD.

Home Politics N11bn fraud: In a brief session, court adjourn case of Shema, 3 others, EFCC again
N11bn fraud: In a brief session, court adjourn case of Shema, 3 others, EFCC again

N11bn fraud: In a brief session, court adjourn case of Shema, 3 others, EFCC again

0

N11bn fraud: In a brief session, court adjourn case of Shema, 3 others, EFCC again 

In continuation of the case between Katsina Ex-governor, Barrister Ibrahim Shema, three former Katsina State’s government officials and Economic Financial and Crimes Commission (EFCC), the Katsina State government had today held a brief session and later adjourned to 14th of November, 2019.

Recall that earlier in June this year, absence of the judge, Justice Mai Kaita Bako presiding over the court case forced it to be adjourned.

Recall also that at the last sitting of the court last April, a witness, Sani Hamisu Makana in the trial within trial told Justice Maikaita Bako of the State High Court that at a meeting held at EFCC office on the November 16th, 2016, the EFCC counsel, Mr. O. I. Uket told them that he “has gone through the case files and all the statements and he has not seen anything tangible that they can go to court with and that is why they invited us if any of us can add to our statement”.

Sani Hamisu Makana told the court that apart from the EFCC lawyer, Mr. Uket, also at the meeting were, three EFCC operatives, Mr. Edward, Abu Fari and Abubakar Buba, including Katsina State Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice, Ahmed El Marzuk, Special Assistant to Governor Aminu Bello Masari, Rabe Nasir, former Permanent Secretary Ministry of Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs, Lawal Rufai, former state chairman ALGON, Ibrahim Dankaba and two other state ALGON officials, Nasir Yat Allah and Hussain Dambo.

Another defense witness, Lawal Rufai during the trial within trial testified that he was at the meeting and that it was true that EFCC lawyer Mr. Uket told them that nothing tangible found from the Commission investigation, the position he maintained during the cross-examination by EFCC counsel, Mr. Uket himself.

During today’s sitting, the defense counsels seek for the adjournment which the prosecution counsel did not object.

LEAVE YOUR COMMENT

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *